<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>The Next Best Thing — Actually, Not So Much</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/06/07/The-Next-Best-Thing----Actually-Not-so-Much.aspx</link>
        <description>I went to college. I read almost every day. I don&amp;rsquo;t consider myself a genius, but I do think I&amp;rsquo;m fairly reliable in connecting the intellectual dots on a canvas &amp;mdash; and yet THE NEXT BEST THING has me genuinely stumped.
&amp;nbsp;
I just don&amp;rsquo;t understand this show. I know the premise of THE NEXT BEST THING: WHO IS THE GREATEST CELEBRITY IMPOSTER? is to find the most amazing celebrity impersonation, but I don&amp;rsquo;t understand WHY. Impressions generally go one of two ways: either a mimic does several quick impressions, like judge Elon Gold, or it is a tribute where the impressionist inhabits the full act of a particular performer by doing their songs or material. This show wants something in between, and unfortunately, that in between thing is not entertaining. It&amp;rsquo;s creepy and sad. One woman who made it on to the next round has proudly been doing Madonna for 20 years. Twenty years! That&amp;rsquo;s not creative or expressive, that&amp;rsquo;s a fetish.

</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>info@criticsrant.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
        <item>
            <title>re: The Next Best Thing -- Actually, Not so Much</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/06/07/The-Next-Best-Thing----Actually-Not-so-Much.aspx#557</link>
            <description>I agree with you Buzz Lightyear Byrne&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think they should all try to impersonate Woody and be locked in a toybox</description>
            <dc:creator>Eitaporra4</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/06/07/The-Next-Best-Thing----Actually-Not-so-Much.aspx#557</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:24:42 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>re: The Next Best Thing -- Actually, Not So Much</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/06/07/The-Next-Best-Thing----Actually-Not-so-Much.aspx#573</link>
            <description>this sucks</description>
            <dc:creator>PETJEM79</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/06/07/The-Next-Best-Thing----Actually-Not-so-Much.aspx#573</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 05:41:09 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>re: The Next Best Thing — Actually, Not So Much</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/06/07/The-Next-Best-Thing----Actually-Not-so-Much.aspx#617</link>
            <description>this is a really stupid movie</description>
            <dc:creator>displacedcherokee2</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/06/07/The-Next-Best-Thing----Actually-Not-so-Much.aspx#617</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:52:59 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>