<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>John From Cincinnati — Nope, "Sopranos" It Ain't</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/06/18/John-From-Cincinnati--Nope-Sopranos-It-Aint.aspx</link>
        <description>JOHN FROM CINCINNATI isn&amp;rsquo;t a Western, but it better get off its high horse pretty soon. Raising questions can be a good thing &amp;mdash; but at some point, it has to provide answers. Existential angst is not likely to work as a SOPRANOS replacement

There was a time when even I had potential. But suddenly (or so it seemed), I was no longer a wunderkind, and that Great American Novel had to wait. It&amp;rsquo;s the same with JOHN FROM CINCINNATI &amp;mdash; except TV series get old a lot quicker. And, JOHN is aging rapidly. Very rapidly.
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 
I enjoyed the first episode, if for no other reason than it was different; not typical TV pabulum. The series&amp;rsquo; writers seemed to credit viewers with a modicum of intelligence and curiosity; a willingness to venture off into uncharted territory.
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 
They provided just enough information to pique at least my curiosity &amp;mdash; they got me eager to come back for more.&amp;nbsp; I wanted to find out why people were levitating and how a dead bird was brought back to life. I was interested in learning who the heck the very strange title character really is. But, after hour two we don&amp;rsquo;t know much more than we did after hour one. It&amp;rsquo;s hard to generate interest in a series based on unanswered questions and confusion.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>info@criticsrant.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
        <item>
            <title>re: John From Cincinnati — Nope, &amp;quot;Sopranos&amp;quot; It Ain't</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/06/18/John-From-Cincinnati--Nope-Sopranos-It-Aint.aspx#2169</link>
            <description>well, at least theres a cute guy in it</description>
            <dc:creator>brokun1</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/06/18/John-From-Cincinnati--Nope-Sopranos-It-Aint.aspx#2169</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:47:22 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>re: John From Cincinnati — Nope, &amp;quot;Sopranos&amp;quot; It Ain't</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/06/18/John-From-Cincinnati--Nope-Sopranos-It-Aint.aspx#2174</link>
            <description>i miss the sopranos</description>
            <dc:creator>tinkluvspan</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/06/18/John-From-Cincinnati--Nope-Sopranos-It-Aint.aspx#2174</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:21:14 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>