<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>ROGER RABBIT Sequel In The Works?</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/15/ROGER-RABBIT-Sequel-In-The-Works.aspx</link>
        <description>Anyone who is anyone between ages twenty and thirty surely remembers when WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT hit theaters in 1988, with its &amp;ldquo;revolutionary&amp;rdquo; new techniques in filmmaking, which allowed live actors to share the screen with animated characters. While that classic film might seem outdated in this brave new world of CGI, it seems the minds behind the lovable hare with the hot wife haven&amp;rsquo;t forgotten him.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>info@criticsrant.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
        <item>
            <title>re: ROGER RABBIT Sequel In The Works?</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/15/ROGER-RABBIT-Sequel-In-The-Works.aspx#2583</link>
            <description>i have to admit that i really love the first roger rabbit. so, i would have to watch another.</description>
            <dc:creator>brokun1</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/15/ROGER-RABBIT-Sequel-In-The-Works.aspx#2583</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 02:47:43 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>re: ROGER RABBIT Sequel In The Works?</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/15/ROGER-RABBIT-Sequel-In-The-Works.aspx#2585</link>
            <description>cool i loved the first one:)</description>
            <dc:creator>tinkluvspan</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/15/ROGER-RABBIT-Sequel-In-The-Works.aspx#2585</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:48:49 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>re: ROGER RABBIT Sequel In The Works?</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/15/ROGER-RABBIT-Sequel-In-The-Works.aspx#2593</link>
            <description>one roger rabbit was enough. don't waste the money.there are other good stories out there somewhere to make into movies</description>
            <dc:creator>WAVELYN</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/15/ROGER-RABBIT-Sequel-In-The-Works.aspx#2593</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:22:20 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>re: ROGER RABBIT Sequel In The Works?</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/15/ROGER-RABBIT-Sequel-In-The-Works.aspx#2877</link>
            <description>I remember hearing they had trouble matching the CGI props with the 2D animation in tests shots back then. CGI props makes a lot of sense now. It dosn't say if the actual characters will be CGI but I did read there were CGI tests of ALL characters as well. The point of Roger Rabbit however WAS the 2D animated Cartoons in real life. If you make it 3D, it changes it too much. I wouldn't mind seeing the CGI characters in a holiday special or something.</description>
            <dc:creator>JACanepa</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/15/ROGER-RABBIT-Sequel-In-The-Works.aspx#2877</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:44:41 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>