<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>GODFATHER II: A Masterpiece As Good As The Original</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/20/GODFATHER-II-A-Masterpiece-As-Good-As-The-Original.aspx</link>
        <description>Some sequels are inevitable, due to money or, very rarely, story requirements. In the case of THE GODFATHER, the original made such a splash that a sequel was approved before filming on the first installment wrapped. Fortunately, Mario Puzo&amp;rsquo;s novel was so rich that making a sequel made sense story-wise, and so Francis Ford Coppola and Puzo managed to do the unlikely: whip up a second installment in the Corleone saga that was just as good as the first.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>info@criticsrant.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
    </channel>
</rss>