<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>BOSTON LEGAL -- "Roe V. Wade, The Musical"</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2008/01/23/BOSTON-LEGAL----Roe-V.-Wade-The-Musical.aspx</link>
        <description>Oh how I look forward to watching this brilliantly written and acted show, especially considering how dismal the new programming this past Fall was. Don&amp;rsquo;t even get me started on some of the mid-season replacements we&amp;rsquo;re beginning to see flood the TV landscape. I swear, I think my four-year-old nephew could do a better job of coming up with creative and entertaining shows than the people in charge right now. Than again, lazy and unimaginative programming is nothing new in the TV industry. In fact, sometimes I feel more energy is put into the marketing of these shows than the creation of them. But I digress; tonight is about the excellence that can be achieved when talent and effort come together.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>headersrock@yahoo.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
    </channel>
</rss>