<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>RAMBO: Not Nearly As Atrocious As Predicted</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2008/01/27/RAMBO-Not-Nearly-As-Atrocious-As-Predicted.aspx</link>
        <description>The most surprising thing about RAMBO is that it isn&amp;rsquo;t the shoe-in for the 2008 Razzie Award like a lot of us thought it would be. The fourth installment of the &amp;ldquo;First Blood&amp;rdquo; franchise is actually a pretty faithful throwback to the &amp;ldquo;man-movie&amp;rdquo; action flicks of the 80&amp;rsquo;s and early 90&amp;rsquo;s, such over-the-top testosterone romps like DIE HARD, or LETHAL WEAPON, which would never play in our modern, femme-powered culture.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>headersrock@yahoo.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
    </channel>
</rss>