<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>Universal Nabs Tarantino’s ‘Inglorious Bastards’</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2008/07/31/Universal-Nabs-Tarantinos-Inglorious-Bastards.aspx</link>
        <description>Quentin Tarantino&amp;rsquo;s Inglorious Bastards remake has been causing quite a buzz since the script was leaked online, with many web-critics going so far as to call it a &amp;ldquo;masterpiece.&amp;rdquo; Well, the major studios have taken notice, with Universal jumping in the ring alongside longtime Tarantino collaborators the Weinstein Co. to bring Inglorious Bastards to a theater near you. 

Rumor has it that Tarantino and the Weinsteins sat down sometime last week to decide between Paramount and Universal and Universal won the debate. Don&amp;rsquo;t know if I would have gone that way given Universal&amp;rsquo;s lack of $trong returns at the box office the last few years, but hey, that&amp;rsquo;s why I&amp;rsquo;m just a blogger, and not a major player in the Hollywood game (a guy can dream though&amp;hellip;)</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>headersrock@yahoo.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
    </channel>
</rss>