<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>BALLS OF FURY: Dumb Fun</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/08/31/BALLS-OF-FURY.aspx</link>
        <description>It&amp;rsquo;s hard to put into words just how stupid BALLS OF FURY truly is. From all appearances, this movie probably sprung into being after the creators smoked a bale of weed and overdosed on chop-socky flicks, up to and including ENTER THE DRAGON. If Uma hadn&amp;rsquo;t already stolen the yellow suit for KILL BILL, it probably would have shown up here. I would guess the pitch to the studio must have also involved getting baked. 

This isn&amp;rsquo;t necessarily a bad thing. There is a place in any film lover&amp;rsquo;s heart for gloriously idiotic films, especially when made by smart people who are gleefully aware how insane their material is. BALLS OF FURY definitely falls into this category; the fact that a good chunk of the creative team is involved with RENO 911 should give you a rough idea where the humor is pitched.

Still, if you&amp;rsquo;re going to go this route, you need to really have the courage of your convictions and go for broke. The real problem with BALLS OF FURY is that it&amp;rsquo;s too tame. Whether this is a side effect of the studio wanting to keep the golden PG-13 or just that half the script was illegible when the writers sobered up, it&amp;rsquo;s tough to say. My guess is it&amp;rsquo;s mostly the writers&amp;rsquo; fault, as many of the supposed one-liners seemed a little pale, but given the pucker factor of most Hollywood studios anymore, I wouldn&amp;rsquo;t bet against the &amp;ldquo;rewrite by committee&amp;rdquo; option.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>info@criticsrant.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
        <item>
            <title>re: BALLS OF FURY: Dumb Fun</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/08/31/BALLS-OF-FURY.aspx#1345</link>
            <description>I thought Balls of Fury was about a B- the beginning was very good but then the last 15 minutes kinda of dragged on which is bad because the movie was only 1 hr 30.</description>
            <dc:creator>another6655</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/08/31/BALLS-OF-FURY.aspx#1345</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>re: BALLS OF FURY: Dumb Fun</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/08/31/BALLS-OF-FURY.aspx#1773</link>
            <description>looks really funny want to see it</description>
            <dc:creator>tinkluvspan</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/08/31/BALLS-OF-FURY.aspx#1773</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>re: BALLS OF FURY: Dumb Fun</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/08/31/BALLS-OF-FURY.aspx#2033</link>
            <description>I USUALLY DONT LIKE THESE KINDS OF MOVIES BUT I LIKE CERTAIN ACTORS IN IT THAT MAKE ME WANNA GIVE IT A SHOT</description>
            <dc:creator>brokun1</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/08/31/BALLS-OF-FURY.aspx#2033</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:54:47 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>