<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>PROJECT RUNWAY -- "Trendsetters"</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/10/PROJECT-RUNWAY----Trendsetters.aspx</link>
        <description>This week my suspicion about the sad PROJECT RUNWAY typecasts is finally confirmed.&amp;nbsp; Too bad it isn&amp;rsquo;t killing all parts of this show because some of the contestants are not only happy to play the role they are cast as, but they&amp;rsquo;re willing to do it while being as dumb as possible.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>info@criticsrant.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
    </channel>
</rss>