<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>Faith McQuinn's Year-End Rant: Best and Worst Sequels of 2007</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/16/Faith-McQuinns-Year-End-Rant-Best-and-Worst-Sequels-of-2007.aspx</link>
        <description>If 2007 could be called anything, it should be called the Year of the Threequel--if you&amp;rsquo;ll be so kind as to consider that a word. This year audiences were treated to the third (and hopefully final) movie of a lot of franchises&amp;mdash;SHREK, RESIDENT EVIL, PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN, and so on. Every single one can be considered entertaining, but not all of them are what I would call good.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>info@criticsrant.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
        <item>
            <title>re: Faith McQuinn's Year-End Rant: Best and Worst Sequels of 2007</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/16/Faith-McQuinns-Year-End-Rant-Best-and-Worst-Sequels-of-2007.aspx#2598</link>
            <description>good information here</description>
            <dc:creator>brokun1</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/16/Faith-McQuinns-Year-End-Rant-Best-and-Worst-Sequels-of-2007.aspx#2598</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:56:16 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>re: Faith McQuinn's Year-End Rant: Best and Worst Sequels of 2007</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/16/Faith-McQuinns-Year-End-Rant-Best-and-Worst-Sequels-of-2007.aspx#2611</link>
            <description>"If THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM is the model action movie, then SPIDER-MAN 3 is the dunce sitting in the corner."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;LOL...beautiful.</description>
            <dc:creator>Mandi</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/16/Faith-McQuinns-Year-End-Rant-Best-and-Worst-Sequels-of-2007.aspx#2611</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:27:07 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>re: Faith McQuinn's Year-End Rant: Best and Worst Sequels of 2007</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/16/Faith-McQuinns-Year-End-Rant-Best-and-Worst-Sequels-of-2007.aspx#2616</link>
            <description>i agree with you</description>
            <dc:creator>WAVELYN</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/16/Faith-McQuinns-Year-End-Rant-Best-and-Worst-Sequels-of-2007.aspx#2616</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>re: Faith McQuinn's Year-End Rant: Best and Worst Sequels of 2007</title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/16/Faith-McQuinns-Year-End-Rant-Best-and-Worst-Sequels-of-2007.aspx#2659</link>
            <description>cool movies</description>
            <dc:creator>tinkluvspan</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/16/Faith-McQuinns-Year-End-Rant-Best-and-Worst-Sequels-of-2007.aspx#2659</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:16:45 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>