<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>NATIONAL TREASURE: BOOK OF SECRETS: It's No Secret, The First Movie Was Better </title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/24/NATIONAL-TREASURE-BOOK-OF-SECRETS-Its-No-Secret-The-First.aspx</link>
        <description>I have never begun to understand how critics can pan a movie like NATIONAL TREASURE: BOOK OF SECRETS. I mean, doesn&amp;rsquo;t everyone understand what kind of movie he or she is going to see when the names Jerry Bruckheimer and Nicolas Cage appear on the screen? Well, if they don&amp;rsquo;t, I do. It&amp;rsquo;s not spectacular filmmaking by any stretch of the imagination, but it was never meant to be. In a season brimming with Oscar hopefuls, sometimes all a person wants is a good popcorn action movie.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>info@criticsrant.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
        <item>
            <title>re: NATIONAL TREASURE: BOOK OF SECRETS: It's No Secret, The First Movie Was Better </title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/24/NATIONAL-TREASURE-BOOK-OF-SECRETS-Its-No-Secret-The-First.aspx#2695</link>
            <description>i wouldnt know but i was hoping to now im not so sure. lol</description>
            <dc:creator>needs50</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/24/NATIONAL-TREASURE-BOOK-OF-SECRETS-Its-No-Secret-The-First.aspx#2695</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:07:06 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>re: NATIONAL TREASURE: BOOK OF SECRETS: It's No Secret, The First Movie Was Better </title>
            <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/24/NATIONAL-TREASURE-BOOK-OF-SECRETS-Its-No-Secret-The-First.aspx#2873</link>
            <description>I like the movie. It's fun. You know what to expect, so...don't expect to be blown away, it gives what it promises to give.</description>
            <dc:creator>Fernanda</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2007/12/24/NATIONAL-TREASURE-BOOK-OF-SECRETS-Its-No-Secret-The-First.aspx#2873</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:38:23 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>