<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>CLOVERFIELD: The Best Monster Movie We've Had In A Long Time</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2008/01/20/CLOVERFIELD-The-Best-Monster-Movie-Weve-Had-In-A-Long.aspx</link>
        <description>If you&amp;rsquo;re going to see CLOVERFIELD because you&amp;rsquo;re looking for an in-depth character study or some sort of psychological thriller about an unknown creature or even some version of LOST in Manhattan, please move on. This movie is not for you. If you&amp;rsquo;re looking for an exciting, gripping, realistic (well, as realistic as it can be) monster movie, then go right ahead and buy that ticket.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>headersrock@yahoo.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
    </channel>
</rss>