<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>CHUCK -- "Chuck Versus The Marlin"</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2008/01/25/CHUCK----Chuck-Versus-The-Marlin.aspx</link>
        <description>As goofy as CHUCK is, to make it work there needs to be some danger, some real risk, some real threat to these fun cartoon-y characters that make us smile. In other words there needs to be at least some wadding pool depth or no one would care and in the second episode of the CHUCK sandwich delivered by NBC we got just that: pathos.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>headersrock@yahoo.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
    </channel>
</rss>