<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>THE L WORD -- "Lady of the Lake"</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2008/01/28/THE-L-WORD----Lady-of-the-Lake.aspx</link>
        <description>Editor's note: due to a technical glitch that we like to call &amp;quot;A monkey broke into our server and had its way with our inner workings,&amp;quot; this episode of THE L WORD should have been posted in place of last Sunday's episode. We apologize, and have since sacked the monkey.&amp;nbsp; 

Lady of the Lake opens with more of the silliness that pervaded much of the first two episodes of THE L WORD this season: a Charlie&amp;rsquo;s Angels (now Bev&amp;rsquo;s Angels) sequence that doesn&amp;rsquo;t make any sense to me.&amp;nbsp; And that&amp;rsquo;s just the beginning.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>headersrock@yahoo.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
    </channel>
</rss>