<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>THE WIRE -- "Not For Attribution"</title>
        <link>http://www.criticsrant.com/archive/2008/01/28/THE-WIRE----Not-For-Attribution.aspx</link>
        <description>Editor's note: due to a technical glitch that we like to call &amp;quot;A mischievous badger broke into our server and had its way with our inner workings,&amp;quot; this episode of THE WIRE should have been posted in place of last Sunday's episode. We apologize, and have since sacked the badger. 

If there is a show bleaker in its outlook than THE WIRE, I do not know what it is.&amp;nbsp; It actually makes global warming look like a good thing.&amp;nbsp; And by bleak I don&amp;rsquo;t mean that the show is bad.&amp;nbsp; On the contrary, it is the best drama on the air right now.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; But it is so overly negative in tone it is almost oppressive.</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Critics Rant</copyright>
        <managingEditor>headersrock@yahoo.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.4.0</generator>
        
    </channel>
</rss>